Tue 19 Jun 2007
Sometimes, even a Harvard education can’t make you a good writer or an impartial journalist. So proves one Hazel Trice Edney today, publishing one of the most obnoxious flaming paper sacks of libelous crap I have seen outside of Fox News in quite some time.
Now, we all know my boy Joe Biden has the occasional oral stumble, which is bound to happen when you’re trying to fit a 30 minute policy analysis into a 30 second sound bite on the campaign trail. Two weeks ago was no exception, perhaps, when Biden was the only presidential candidate to address the 100 Black Men of America conference, a nonprofit organization focused on increasing educational and economic development in the black community. When questioned by a small gathering of the attendees about the poor showing of new legislation that would benefit African Americans, Biden argued that the lack of attention to black issues was a result of ignorance or cultural disconnect on the part of many congressmen:
“Look guys, most of the guys and women in the United States Congress who don’t come from communities with broader black populations, they don’t know that there is a decent stream of accomplished business men and women in the black community out there. They don’t know it. Y’all are a secret. The only white boy that figured it out was Clinton,” he said to jovial laughter from the group.
Now, if there’s any offense to be taken from that remark, I’d say it should be taken by Biden’s fellow members of Congress who might feel they were just called inattentive to their constituents. However, with Hazel Edney on the case, it’s African Americans who should all be offended, because according to her, this is just another example of racial insensitivity.
She believes this to be the case so much — or perhaps is just so desperate to gin up some buzz around what is otherwise some pretty dull reporting and maybe shine in the spotlight of national scandal for fifteen glorious minutes — that she takes her little editorial scissors, cuts up Biden’s words, and rearranges them into a more dramatically acceptable gotcha headline.
“Biden: Some members of Congress don’t know there are ‘decent’ black business people,” reads the banner print at Frost Illustrated, member publication of the National Newspaper Publishers Association for which Edney is Washington correspondent. She reiterates that completely distorted — hell, let’s call a turd a turd, it’s practically fabricated — line later on in the article:
Biden’s statement about his colleagues’ lack of knowledge about “decent” black business men and women was clearly his way of explaining their inability to understand the need for certain legislation. But, it harkened back to his comment about his colleague, Sen. Barack Obama, earlier this year. Black leaders roundly criticized Biden for describing Obama as “articulate” and “clean.”
And thus, by citing the previous, terribly overblown pseudo-scandal, Edney solidifies in her paranoid mind the complete hallucination that obviously Joe Biden doesn’t think people know about “decent black business people,” setting aside the fact that Edney had to rape the rules of English grammar to make the fantasy complete.
I know a lot of you aren’t quite the fans of the Senator that I am, but you can’t be fluent in the English language and not recognize that this wretched excuse for “journalism” is complete and utter cowpie. Let me say it again, in very clear, Google-blog-search palatable terms:
Hazel Trice Edney = yellow journalism.
Yeah, I said it. If that headline ain’t libel, it is damn, damn close. So much for her fancy master’s degree! Hazel, I’d expect this kind of writing from Ann Coulter or Michelle Malkin, not a Harvard graduate. Oh well, nice going.
Edney tries to cover her posterior by getting Rep. Conyers to stand by her, in an awkward sentence that could really benefit from that unnecessary post-conjunction comma* in the previous blockquote:
U.S. Rep. John Conyers, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, who attended the organization’s convention the day after Biden was to receive the coveted Man of the Year award.
He shook his head when asked if he agreed with Biden’s assessment about the members of Congress.
“There he goes again,” Conyers said. “‘He just doesn’t get it.”
What Conyers really doesn’t get is that he was talking not to a real, respectable reporter, but someone with a notepad and a slight problem with accurately representing the truth. How much do you want to bet he didn’t get the actual quote, but rather was fed the grammatically-butchered propaganda, before asked for a response?
So if you’re ever at a political event with NNPA’s Washington correspondent, let me give you a handy list of example sentences not to utter, lest our star reporter jam your descriptors into all the wrong phrases in the interest of a little sensationalism:
- “I would kill to meet Barack Obama!”
- “Hillary Clinton’s YouTube video was an amazing example of how SexyBack gives a story legs!”
- “That fart scene was a very amusing aside in that movie about Idi Amin.”
- “Pizza is the most delicious precursor to poop.”
- “Closing Abu Ghraib would be the most applauded response to systemic torture.”
I mean, you wouldn’t want Edney to go around reporting that you “applauded ’systemic’ torture” that used “delicious” poop on Hillary Clinton’s “amazing…sexy back [and] legs” in an effort to “kill” Barack Obama? But then, I’d expect that kind of deviant behavior from someone who found Idi Amin “amusing.”
* Raise your hand if you had to read that more than once before you figured out that Biden wasn’t receiving the Man of the Year Award.



June 20th, 2007 at 11:29 am
The Obama thing was pretty ridiculous, and based on that, I’d say Biden doesn’t get it. “Clean” and “articulate”… come on… who says that??
This one, yes, there are distorted words.
June 20th, 2007 at 11:55 am
Yeah I’ll give you January, but this Edney uses that episode to justify the complete butchery of a current statement, and that’s just ridiculous.
You’ve also got to consider the audience, too. Trent Lott muttering to a bunch of other old white guys that the country should’ve elected Strom Thurmond is one context; Joe Biden talking face to face with black business leaders about other people not seeing the whole picture is entirely another. I think considering his civil rights record and overall support from black leaders, a reasonable person ought to be able to see the context as one of, “Hey, I’m on your side, and I want to tell you something about what’s wrong with the system that I am admittedly a part of.” If you look at a lot of the post-Obama incident journalism written by black journalists, you can see the same context: do you doubt for one second that Obama doesn’t enjoy an extra boost of popularity among the general populace because he, to borrow a quote from Colin Powell (another popular putative candidate), “ain’t that black?” Debra Dickerson used that very point to smack white people for being so self-congratulatory for liking Obama.
You quoted another blog a few weeks back, around the time of the Cardinale stabbing, about people of privilege removing their cultural lens and seeing the injustices that the non-privileged see, but even in the process of so doing there is a kind of internal backlash, because it’s not an easy transition. Or something like that — am I even close? Well, I was hopeful that that kind of perspective might inform those who hope for positive social change to be a little bit more patient with those coming to the movement from positions of privilege, but as I see time and again in the progressive community, that patience isn’t there, and as soon as an otherwise well-meaning white guy says something that betrays an old cultural lens, let’s burn ‘im at the stake! You know who might say “clean” and “articulate” (though I still argue that “clean” is not in the context that the paranoiacs would accuse)? A guy who grew up in the 40s and 50s in a working class white Irish family. Nevermind that the pre-Baby Boomer from the working class white Irish family then went on to become a dedicated servant of civil rights for 35 years in the Senate, though; one verbal fumble and y’all gotta hold it against him as a badge of racism forever. With that kind of standard for who gets to be in the little club of progressive change, you might as well forever rule out anyone who you’d currently call a person of privilege and spend the rest of time planning the revolution, when you can burn all of us at the stake.