Mon 2 Jul 2007
I should have trusted my instincts. I knew the iPhone wasn’t going to turn water into wine or cause AAPL to double and split overnight — and really, I figured the week after the iPhone would be a great time to buy once everyone realized it was iMediocre. Nevertheless, I didn’t want to be left out in the cold and decided to think long term, so I bought a metric butt-ton of AAPL, back when it was worth $2 more than it is today. Hooray, net loss.
Would you people go out and buy more iPhones already???
Oh wait. Maybe you just don’t want to take it up the iButt like Josh and his iBrick and countless other unhappy customers. The short version: the iPhones apparently work great and are in fact quite amazing (I was particularly impressed with how it survived immediate punishment quite unharmed), but they won’t do a damn thing until they’ve been activated with AT&T cellular service. No music, no calendar, no surfing the net on WiFi, nothing.
Steve Jobs showed us the iPhone at WWDC and said this was a new iPod; he lied, it’s not. He said this was a revolutionary internet device; he lied, it’s not. iPods play music as soon as you buy them. Internet tablets can connect to WiFi as soon as it sniffs one out. In reality, the iPhone is yet another symbol of the rape of the American consumer by a plutocratic oligopoly of the big cellular providers. Oh, people were so excited about the prospects of Steve Jobs and his miracle phone changing the way the wireless business worked, forcing AT&T to give us a list of voicemails, freeing iTunes users from overpriced carrier-controlled music downloads, and bringing mobile handset WiFi to the ($500-to-spare) masses.
But in the end, Steve Jobs bent us all over to take it up the collective keister by allowing AT&T to hobble his saviorPhone so that without an AT&T contract, it doesn’t do a damn thing. So much for changing the industry, Steve, you gutless snake oil salesman.
When Steve Garfield popped through town with his Nokia N95, I asked him what carrier he was using so I’d know what I’d be switching to in order to have such a fine toy. He said he didn’t actually have phone service on his phone. He was basically carrying around a digital camera with built-in WiFi for uploading his pictures and videos to the net, and a PDA with built-in bluetooth to keep his contacts and appointments synched with his computer. He didn’t have to be anyone’s bitch to get 90% of the functionality out of his multi-function device, and even without a wireless carrier (AT&T and T-Mo are your choices for this baby), I’d still shell out $750 for such a fancy toy, because frankly I don’t like talking to people that much anyway.
I hope a lot of iPhone owners don’t like talking to people, either, ’cause thanks to Steve Jobs and AT&T, they can’t.
11 Responses to “ iPhlop ”
Comments:
Leave a Reply
Trackbacks & Pingbacks:
-
Pingback from Creative Loafing Atlanta » Fresh Loaf » Blog Archive » Atlanta blogs today: East Atlanta kidnappings
July 2nd, 2007 at 1:04 pm[…] -Shelbinator doesn’t like the iPhone. Tags: atlanta blogs, drew westen, East Atlanta, shelbinator […]


July 2nd, 2007 at 1:39 pm
Now I feel better about not being able to afford it.
July 2nd, 2007 at 3:40 pm
Oh my 2% out of an estimated 500,000 had to wait maybe a day or two to get their numbers ported or phone activated. You’d think you could find something better to complain about. The damn thing will be hacked in less than a month and then you can sign up with whomever you choose to be “raped” by as you so eloquently put it. Last time I checked all cell phone companies are in business to earn a profit.
July 2nd, 2007 at 3:58 pm
Yeah Jim, they are in business to earn a profit, but there’s a difference between earning a profit and exacting one. Imagine if you will (and I’m sure you could, since I’m just a whiny, anti-corporate blogger, right?) that I have no friends I particularly like and thus don’t want a cellular phone service, but I would like to spend $599 on a new Apple device that will replace my aging 4G iPod, allow me to watch videos, and surf the web at the countless WiFi hotspots that I buy coffee and beer at. The iPhone suits that bill, except I can’t actually use the thing without hooking myself up to AT&T? That is moronic and anti-competitive. If you are completely oblivious to the pathetic state of American cellular telephony, then you’ve got bigger problems — be they in ignorance or pro-business-at-any-price mania — than my ranty li’l blog. Like the price of our AAPL, for instance.
And no, I don’t really have anything better to complain about: I have good research data coming in from NASA, I got my new calculator, it’s my birthday, I have cake, and I’m going to go drink beer and sing karaoke. Life is good.
July 2nd, 2007 at 10:11 pm
Jim needs to learn that just because it’s all fancy schmancy and brand new doesn’t make it worth the money…(and yes i agree that it does SEEM cool at first glance but i’m one of the many who can’t drop half a g on a PHONE). OR he can just go ahead and bend over now and take it up the keister from apple and THEN again from ATT. I’m with you on holding out for the nokia.
HAPPY BERFDAY! I am so bummed to be missing one helluva karaoke partay!
July 2nd, 2007 at 11:39 pm
I have had AT&T since before it was Cingular. Because I have been with them for so long I have been able to get 750 minutes a month plus unlimited nights and weekends all for $39.99, I have never renewed my contract thru cingular thus keeping all of my minutes from the old Att wireless in tact. I will gladly add $20.00 for 200 text messages, internet browsing, being able to check my email through “Mail” and not having to carry a separate ipod with me. Not everyone has to bend over backwards to find value in this product. For you both to assume that everyone has to pay an arm and a leg for this service is naive. If you are not familiar with Apple, they dont always make the cheapest product, but the products they do make are always high quality. If you can afford them great, if you cant ….complain till you’re blue and hope someone throws you a wad of cash.
Happy birthday.
July 2nd, 2007 at 11:58 pm
just saw this, maybe this will make AT&T a little more attractive to you,
http://www.att.com/gen/press-room?pid=4800&cdvn=news&newsarticleid=24031
July 3rd, 2007 at 7:52 am
here ya go as promised 8)
http://www.macrumors.com/2007/07/03/iphone-as-a-widescreen-ipod-wifi-without-contract/
July 3rd, 2007 at 9:13 pm
Yeah, just as a figured, Jim, you’re completely missing my point. No, AT&T is not “an arm and a leg.” There’s hardly much difference between any of the providers’ packages and pricing. And I know Apple makes high end products worth the price: you’re kvetching at a guy with an iBook, an iMac, a Macbook, and 3G and Nano iPods. However, Apple allowed AT&T to effectively cripple its product by requiring AT&T service activation before it performs in any capacity whatsoever. The only “bending over” here is Apple and its product fans taking it up the rear to the typical cellular strongarm practice of hobbling the inherent capabilities of devices in order to force the consumer to pay extra for a feature that the product would support natively without the cell company’s interference. My crappy Moto RAZR is technically capable of transferring pictures and videos to my computer via Bluetooth, but Verizon made sure to put a stop to that through crippling firmware mods.
I see you’ve posted some lousy “hacks” to get iPhone activation without an AT&T contract (even though they still require some more $), but again, you’re missing the point: why does the device require such activation in the first place? I don’t have to hack my iPod to make it play music, I shouldn’t have to hack shit to make it do shit that it’s built to do.
But who cares, the stock is finally going up again, right?
July 4th, 2007 at 9:40 am
No need for me to post anymore here. You asked for something specific……….
“Imagine if you will (and I’m sure you could, since I’m just a whiny, anti-corporate blogger, right?) that I have no friends I particularly like and thus don’t want a cellular phone service, but I would like to spend $599 on a new Apple device that will replace my aging 4G iPod, allow me to watch videos, and surf the web at the countless WiFi hotspots that I buy coffee and beer at. The iPhone suits that bill, except I can’t actually use the thing without hooking myself up to AT&T?”
and I provided it…….
http://www.macrumors.com/2007/07/03/iphone-as-a-widescreen-ipod-wifi-without-contract/
and then you post
“I see you’ve posted some lousy “hacks” to get iPhone activation without an AT&T contract ”
enjoy your iphone envy sir 8)
I got mine….and it’s magnificent.
Take care.
July 4th, 2007 at 12:21 pm
Jesus. It’s like you have your fingers in your ears. Go play with your phone, and get your own damn blog.