Geekery


The ISEF08 winners have been announced, and the recipients of the grand prize scholarships are these fine young ladies (left to right, below): Natalie Omattage of Cleveland, MS; Yi-Han Su of Taipei, Taiwan (I’m politically incorrect like that); and Sana Raoof of Muttontown, NY. While they were being put through the wringer for publicity photos, I asked them to do one more silly pose. Eat this, “Math is Hard” Barbie!

ISEF08 Angels, originally uploaded by shelbinator.


Oh, to be eighteen again!

Some mobile video from the N95:


MP4 format

So um, someday your laptop computer won’t roast the tops of your thighs, and it has something to do with nano light waveguide things. Now if you’ll excuse me, I have to go light my master’s degree on fire and hide under my desk while I try to process all that I heard in my brief visit to the Intel science & engineering fair today.

Next time you think of stereotyping teenage girls as omg lol txt American Idol w my bff, just say the phrase “quantum computing” to yourself and then realize that this girl will totally drink your milkshake.

The Intel International Science and Engineering Fair is underway in our fair city of Atlanta. Today and tomorrow the kids are being judged — judged I tell you! Scrutinized, interrogated, and judged, and lucky for them (and not for us), this part of the fair is not open to the public. So much for my Project Runway spoofery.

But I did drop in Sunday and Monday to check out the setup and meet some of the contestants, of whom there are thousands, it seems. I think the PR agency told me something in the neighborhood of 1,500 exhibits, many of which are partner or team efforts. They’re from all over the flippin’ globe; yesterday I watched some Minnesotans exchange pins with some Saudis.

It’s open to the public on Thursday, the 15th, from 9 a.m. to 9 p.m. in building B of the Georgia World Congress Center and it’s free, so you really have no excuse. Well, maybe you do, but if you aren’t doing anything, I highly recommend you satisfy your inner nerd and check it out. (The students will be on hand to explain their stuff from 10 a.m. to 2 p.m.) Here’s a preview:

Other versions: High quality (VGA); QVGA streaming Quicktime; mobile QCIF

Stay tuned for the next episode: meet some of the contestants in the final hours of setup.

A couple weeks ago I saw @waynesutton tweet about ordering an Invisible Shield™ cover for his new N95. That reminded me that I had seen the rather impressive video demonstrating this polymer film’s toughness on YouTube. Developed originally to protect the leading edge of military helicopter blades, they say, the stuff has ridiculous tensile strength and is lifetime guaranteed against scratching.

It’s just a thin film like those other, cheaper PDA screen protectors, so it’s not exactly drop-on-the-sidewalk protection — although apparently it provides an increase in friction coefficient that makes it less likely you’re going to drop it, even if you just stick it to the bathroom mirror. But for something like the iPhone or the N95, where watching content on a shiny, scratch-free screen is paramount, I figured it might be worth the $30 or so.

My Invisible Shield got here last Friday and I rushed to the coffee table to tear into the package and protect my N95 lickity-split, because I’ve already noticed some very fine, short little scratches despite the lengths I go to to keep it away from anything harder than my fingers.

Not so fast. Invisible Shield comes with a spray that is supposed to facilitate adherence (which I presume is temporary) to your device and prevent fingerprints from getting trapped in the interface. You’re supposed to spray the film, not the gadget, and it’s not exactly going to saturate your electronics or cause damage. Nonetheless, the instructions call for turning the device off, removing the battery, and upon application of the sprayed protective film, leaving it alone, unused, for 12 to 24 hours.

Uh huh, yeah. Needless to say, I have not applied my shield, nor do I have a clue when I might.

So, if you plan on being in a short coma or spending the night in prison sometime soon and you want to keep your iPhone or other beloved toy scratch-free, order your Invisible Shield now!

And then try to quit breathing.

This is just one of those things I need to put out there for the Google-bots to find and index for posterity. Despite there being one YouTube video out there that comes really close to getting this right, and despite the immense collection of geekery within the N95 user base, there still arises the constant question from users: how can I hook up an external mic like the Reuters MoJo tookit has? When even a cellphone guru like the author of MobileJones — whose Twittered quest for a decent mic alternative got me to record my first bluetooth trial (see end of this post) — could not reach a satisfactory solution based on what Google had laying around for us, I decided it was time for a weekend trip to Radio Shack. Because this is what my life has become.

The adapter is not something you can buy directly; the resident scientist from Reuters told us at the Journalism3G conference that they had to cobble up their own makeshift connection. But if journalists can do it, hell, anyone can do it! [Correction: According to @mojosd it was Nokia Labs who cobbled it up for Reuters.]

Like I said, there’s already one serious video about this out there, but Bloggerguy leaves out a couple details and gets one critical (but easily correctable, for the persistent) point wrong. Still, we knew it had to be possible, as vlogger Steve Garfield showed that the N95 video recording was definitely taking the audio from the headset mic, but that only gets you so far. N95 user Bitflung also demonstrated the bluetooth connection as a viable alternative, though the quality of bluetooth audio is pretty low.

So, once and for all, here’s your recipe, as I did it:

  • The 1/8″ jack A/V cable that came with your N95
  • Female-to-female phono plug connector
    05032008049.jpg
  • 1/8″ phone plug to phono jack adapter (note that the “S” on either side of the jack indicates it’s looking for a stereo input)
    05032008048.jpg 05032008047.jpg
  • A self-powered — this is vital — external mic that terminates in a 1/8″ stereo plug. If your mic doesn’t have its own AA, AAA, or button-cell battery, the N95 isn’t going to hear it. **

The last item is the important part, because trying to connect a mono mic with a mono plug (note that some mono shotgun mics still have stereo plugs) won’t work. It has to look like this:
05032008045.jpg
If you’ve got a lavalier or shotgun mic that terminates in a mono plug like this (note the single black band instead of two),
05032008044.jpg
then you’re going to need an additional adapter to convert your mono jack into a stereo jack like this one, or you can replace the 1/8″ stereo jack to phono male plug adapter with this one which goes directly from 1/8″ mono female to phono male. Better yet, you could grab this dual 1/8″ mono female jack to 1/8″ male stereo plug and connect two mono lav mics to your getup. Go nuts.

You should end up with a layout like this:
Final connection

Note that you use the yellow plug on the A/V cable, not the red one that Bloggerguy said in his video. If your phone asks you what you just plugged into it, select “Headset;” if that’s not an option, you screwed something up. In headset mode, the red & white cables represent the stereo output sound that normally goes to your earbuds, and the phone uses the yellow channel, normally for video output, as the microphone input.

I put it all together and demo several different microphones (stereo cardioid, mono shotgun, and lavalier) in this stunning Pulitzer-worthy video, which I’ll embed using Viddler so you can add your own comments:

Here’s the Quicktime file for podcast purposes.

For those of you inclined to interview serial entrepreneurs at loud VC cocktail receptions, you’ll want to skip to the comment I added at the 6:15 mark, where I demo the noise-cutting advantage of all this claptrap.

And if you’re in a real pinch to cut through the noise but you haven’t brought all this A/V gear, I’ve got another video for you that shows that obnoxious bluetooth headset is good for something after all.

**Update: MojoSD raised a point in her post that I hadn’t thought to test: a dynamic mic, like my cheapo AudioTechnica ATR20, ought to work as well even without battery power because it doesn’t require any power from the port (which the N95 doesn’t provide). I just tested that theory, and there’s a catch: if you plug a dynamic mic into the cable, and then plug the cable into the N95, you get “Accessory not supported.” I don’t know why. But, if you plug the cable into the phone first without the microphone attached, you will get the choice to select “Headset” and then you can plug the dynamic mic into the cord/adapters and record successfully from then on. However, the audio has a bit of a buzz to it, so I’d still highly recommend going with a powered mic of some kind.

At this point I think it’s safe to say, if not for the N95 I’d have no reason to live.

Now Nokia’s giving us geeks another thing to distract us from our day jobs, and Spike Lee is part of the problem. Partnering with Jumpcut — the online audio-visual mashup tool that Mitt Romney used in an ad-making contest for his campaign — Nokia is soliciting user-generated content around a theme, from which Spike Lee will weave a movie after viewers vote on their favorites. (I assume they want us to create this media on our Nokia handsets.)

Music means different things to different people. A soothing escape during rush-hour traffic. The remedy for a broken heart. A fire under some dancing feet. With Spike’s Lee’s help, we’re co-creating a film about music and the shared human experience.

Here are the details in case you missed them:

Theme is Humanity and how music plays a role.

Three Acts for you to explore through music, text, photos or video.

Act 1 is Birth.

Birth, huh? Way to narrow it down.

If you’ve got some kind of political addiction or think you need to be punished for having too much fun last night, I’ll be providing live video as opportunities arise (cat fight!) at the 5th district DNC delegate caucus starting around 11.

You can access archived recordings and chat with me live at my Qik page.

Even in the early days of Huffington Post’s “Off the Bus” citizen journalism project, from before I joined up to contribute the occasional video, Mayhill Fowler was one of the standard bearers. Her writing was prolific and her access to campaign events pretty high as well. Since we were, after all, “citizen” journalists — i.e., theoretically had other day jobs to tend to — I sometimes wondered how Mayhill managed to cover so much of California to cover so many political events for zero pay. I guess that’s one of the perqs of being a self-employed writer.

Since shortly after Iowa, I pretty much haven’t heard peep from Off the Bus. Our weekly conference calls died and the focus of the project seemed to shift to these large, distributed projects where dozens of people pore through piles of data to compile a picture. That wasn’t my style, and I had the new MTV gig to worry about (and, uh, that dissertation thing); plus, after Super Tuesday, Georgia went back to being a political wasteland, so it’s not like I have anything good to contribute. I briefly discussed the possibility of the occasional MTV-OTB cross-post, but that withered on the vine.

So it wasn’t until the recent brouhaha over Mayhill’s “bitter” piece that I took a good look at OTB to find out that she has been Off-the-bussing all over the place: from Iowa to Nevada, to Texas, to Pennsylvania now, and of course back to her gigantic home state where she recorded Obama’s latest alleged “gaffe.” Considering her thorough campaign coverage and her sudden fifteen minutes of fame, two questions arise:

  • Where the heck can I get the kind of flexible schedule and disposable income to cover the campaign nationwide for a blog that doesn’t pay?
  • And if you have that kind of disposable income to travel all over creation searching for the indispensable sound byte, could you not for the love of God throw a couple bills of it toward a decent digital audio recorder?

It’s probably worth speculating whether or not this recent Obama story would have the legs it does had there not been actual audio of his comments about gun-loving Bible-thumping voters. Other media analysts have already talked a-plenty about how the controversial comments of Rev. Wright had been around in print since the campaign began, but the scandal didn’t take off till there was video to splash on the tube. This weekend, the news shows are doing the same thing with Mayhill’s recording, even though they still have to throw the transcript up on the screen because the audio is, as Wolf Blitzer just said on Late Edition, “barely audible.” (Then why are you playing it, Wolf? Oh, right, because just showing the text alone wouldn’t make for a catchy story!) It’d be generous as hell to compare this Off the Bus recording with your typical subway driver announcing the next stop. It sounds more like a message left on Spongebob Squarepants’ underwater answering machine.

C’mon, if you’re going to be a national star in citizen journalism, get your audio in 44.1kHz, seriously. Might I suggest the fairly compact and incredibly flexible Samson Zoom H2?

A couple of commenters at HuffPost have brought up the sticky ethical question of whether Mayhill’s act of citizen journalism broke some standards of professional journalistic behavior — something I’m sure will only fuel the local old media naysayers that MostlyMedia likes to track. She went into a private fundraiser where presumably press, cameras, and other recording devices were not allowed. When I was covering Bill Richardson in Atlanta, I was allowed to record his every move and word until he got to a small fundraiser at the end of the day and I was politely informed by staff that this event was not for press. I was welcome to stay, but I could not bust out any cameras or report on the detailed goings on. I’m pretty sure I mentioned this to an editor back at OTB and was told that such protocol was de rigueur at small fundraisers like that.

So, either Mayhill was told something we don’t know, or she assumes such standards of journalism don’t apply to citizen journalists. I haven’t seen anything clarifying what was allowed or not at the fundraiser she attended, so we’ll have to see how that pans out. But it’ll certainly make future old-versus-new media conversations more interesting, I suspect.

UPDATE

Had I done my homework, I could’ve checked OTB editor Marc Cooper’s post on the subject and seen his explanation of the “on the record”ness of this fundraiser:

It was indeed a fundraiser to which the press was not invited. Or if you wish, it was closed to press. Therefore it wasnt on or off the record. Off the record is when journos consenusally agree to witness or hear something on the condition they not report it.

Mayhill, who has given money to Barack, was invited to come to the event by one of the communication staff. They new her in her capacity as a writer for OffTheBus and knew it was quite likely she would write something out of this event.

Indeed, she recorded the event as she sat next to campaign staff.

Let it also be noted that there were approx 100 videocams whirring away inside the room as Barack spoke.

I give this detail for full clarification. Most if not all press was kept out of the room but Mayhill was invited in. She was under no obligation not to report. Obama was indeed more loose lipped than usual. He should be more careful in his choice of words when he is staring into so many video cams, no matter who is holding them.

Well okay then. But I still think, what with all the attention Mayhill’s brought them, OTB oughta buy Mayhill a Zoom H2.

As suspected, there was nothing particularly earth-shattering presented by last night’s panel on new media and ethics in journalism and business. What highlights there were — mostly coming from the Georgia State University professor of journalism (with a special focus on law and communications), Greg Lisby — seemed to be two steps forward only to take one step back a paragraph or two later when yet another unbelievably clueless assertion about the web was made by someone who’s had enough time to get to know better. Lisby came prepared with facts and figures and historical insight, and he had lots of us at the kids’ table looking at each other with raised eyebrows, nodding, and Twittering in unison that we liked what he just said.

No, there was no knife fight between a blogger and a PBA radio newser or anything remotely as exciting. I think the highlight of tension for the evening, in my mind, was around the 2:30 mark of the video below. A fellow asked a question that left the AJC Interactivity Manager nearly apoplectic, along the lines of, “Okay, so maybe most blogs are crap, but at least I know they’re crap, and as your content, which is supposed to be so refined and exclusive, starts sliding toward the crap end of the spectrum, why shouldn’t I just go read the people who specialize in crap from the get-go?” It obviously wasn’t that blunt, but it might as well have been for its effect, because as far as I could tell the AJC rep’s answer was, “But — b’gack — you — hey — we have blogs! And it’s not — we — that’s like, your opinion, man. And uh — I — somebody help me out here.”

Okay, so I don’t have the same detailed summary and analysis of the event as everyone else, but I provided the live video, damnit (though the acoustics of the large room leave plenty to be desired). Steve was much kinder to the AJC than I have been and has some other summary points from the panel, if you’re interested. GriftDrift is downright optimistic about how much better the conversation went last night compared to nine months ago. Sara is closer to my level of general “meh”-ness; same old story, still just admiring the problem.

On the inevitable “how do we standardize bloggers” issue, scroll to the 1:20 mark on this video for a Q&A about whether such a set of standards might possibly arise organically (but still very systematically and with structure) from the blogosphere itself — or rather, from some arbitrary subset of “ten or so” bloggers. Right, let’s start caucusing for the ten standard-bearers now.

Leonard Witt brought up his concern about media consolidation and offered up the blogosphere as at least a partial antidote to that winnowing of voices. But the panel came right back at us (the one moment where we disagreed with the good professor) with a study that said we’re less welcoming to opposing commentary than mainstream media sites. Given the crap that litters the comment sections of the AJC, I’m not yet worried about this point. Shortly after that is when the older gentleman got up and warned us that there were “forces afoot” at this “nascent stage of the blogosphere” who would want to take over the web and “use it for profit.” As Sara already said, Welcome to the twenty-first century!

Thanks to Twitter, I saw an op-ed in the Houston Chronicle taking Obama to task for proposing to pay for his education program with offsets in NASA’s budget, which could jeopardize our ability to get to the space station without relying heavily on Mother Russia. So for this week’s MTV gig I was inspired to do another

Science nerd update!
Science Nerd Update

Links to things mentioned in the video:

Next Page »